Urgensi Amandemen Terhadap Pasal 70 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Sebagai Salah Satu Variabel Penting dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63400/balj.v1i1.4Keywords:
arbitration, economic development, arbitration award annulmentAbstract
Abstrak
Penyelesaian sengketa bisnis/komersial merupakan salah satu variabel penting dalam pembangunan ekonomi, karena hal ini menjadi salah satu indikator yang digunakan oleh komunitas bisnis untuk berinvestasi atau menjalankan usaha di suatu negara. Hal ini juga tercermin dalam kemudahan berusaha (Ease of Doing Business, EoDB) yang dirilis oleh Badan Koordinasi Penanaman Modal (BKPM) Indonesia. Salah satu mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa adalah melalui arbitrase yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (UUAAPS). Arbitrase telah menjadi metode yang dipilih oleh komunitas bisnis untuk menyelesaikan sengketa mereka dibandingkan dengan pengadilan negeri, karena sifat putusan arbitrase yang bersifat final dan mengikat. Namun, di samping beberapa keuntungan menggunakan arbitrase, hukum arbitrase Indonesia memungkinkan adanya kemungkinan untuk membatalkan putusan arbitrase. Dalam beberapa tahun terakhir, permohonan pembatalan putusan arbitrase meningkat sejak diterbitkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014 pada tahun 2014 yang menyatakan bahwa penjelasan Pasal 70 undang-undang arbitrase tidak mengikat secara hukum.
Abstract
Business/commercial dispute settlement is one of important variables in the economic development, as it is one of the indicators used by business communities to invest or doing business in a country. This matter is also reflected in the Ease of Doing Business (EoDB) Released by Indonesia Investment Coordinating Board (BKPM). One of the dispute settlement mechanisms is through arbitration as regulated in the Indonesia’s Arbitration Law No. 30 of 1999 (UUAAPS). Arbitration has been a preferred method chosen by the business communities to resolve their disputes rather than to the state court due to arbitration’s final and binding characteristic. However, beside some advantages of using arbitration, the Indonesia arbitration law allows the possibility to annul an arbitration award. In recent years, the arbitration award annulment request arises since the publication of the Supreme Court Decree No. 15/PUU-XII/2014 in 2014 which stated the elucidation on article 70 arbitration law is not legally binding.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Adhitya Yulwansyah, Aria Adipura Nataatmadja

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
BANI Arbitration and Law Journal is committed to promoting global dissemination of legal knowledge by adhering to the principles of open access. All published articles are freely available to everyone without charge or access restrictions.
Licensing and Copyright
All articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license allows users to:
Read, download, copy, print, distribute, and create derivative works from the articles for any purpose, including commercial purposes.
As long as proper attribution is given to the author(s) and the original source, in accordance with academic standards.
Author Rights
Authors retain full copyright over their work.
By submitting to this journal, authors agree to license their work under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Availability
All published articles are made immediately available online upon publication via the official journal website BANI Arbitration and Law Journal.
No embargo period applies.
Does not charge a subscription or article processing fee
